Fix pow() optimization inconsistencies.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -590,20 +590,14 @@ TRef lj_opt_narrow_pow(jit_State *J, TRef rb, TRef rc, TValue *vb, TValue *vc)
|
||||
rb = conv_str_tonum(J, rb, vb);
|
||||
rb = lj_ir_tonum(J, rb); /* Left arg is always treated as an FP number. */
|
||||
rc = conv_str_tonum(J, rc, vc);
|
||||
/* Narrowing must be unconditional to preserve (-x)^i semantics. */
|
||||
if (tvisint(vc) || numisint(numV(vc))) {
|
||||
int checkrange = 0;
|
||||
/* pow() is faster for bigger exponents. But do this only for (+k)^i. */
|
||||
if (tref_isk(rb) && (int32_t)ir_knum(IR(tref_ref(rb)))->u32.hi >= 0) {
|
||||
int32_t k = numberVint(vc);
|
||||
if (!(k >= -65536 && k <= 65536)) goto force_pow_num;
|
||||
checkrange = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
int32_t k = numberVint(vc);
|
||||
if (!(k >= -65536 && k <= 65536)) goto force_pow_num;
|
||||
if (!tref_isinteger(rc)) {
|
||||
/* Guarded conversion to integer! */
|
||||
rc = emitir(IRTGI(IR_CONV), rc, IRCONV_INT_NUM|IRCONV_CHECK);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (checkrange && !tref_isk(rc)) { /* Range guard: -65536 <= i <= 65536 */
|
||||
if (!tref_isk(rc)) { /* Range guard: -65536 <= i <= 65536 */
|
||||
TRef tmp = emitir(IRTI(IR_ADD), rc, lj_ir_kint(J, 65536));
|
||||
emitir(IRTGI(IR_ULE), tmp, lj_ir_kint(J, 2*65536));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user